![mac mini for music production and video editing mac mini for music production and video editing](https://9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/02/M1-Mac-mini-beneath-Pro-Display-XDR.jpg)
- Mac mini for music production and video editing 1080p#
- Mac mini for music production and video editing upgrade#
- Mac mini for music production and video editing software#
Therefore, Intel Core i7-8700K (12- logical cores, 3.7 GHz) is a popular processor for professional video editing workstations. For Adobe Premiere Pro, it is better to use 8-12 logical cores and clock speed above 3.0 GHz. 6-8-core processor is optimal for 4K preview.įrequency is also a determining factor for computer speed.
Mac mini for music production and video editing 1080p#
Quad-core processor is optimal for 1080p preview.Six-core processor is optimal for 4K encoding.Quad-core processor is optimal for 1080p encoding.The more cores the processor has, the more advantages for the user: faster preview creation, faster files encoding into playable formats, better responsiveness when running several programs. The amount and speed of the processor core determine how fast you can perform video editing tasks. The processor is the main basis for video editing computers and budget gaming laptops. To do this, consider all the following components. Assembling your own computer for video editing and multimedia and carefully selecting each component according to your needs, it is easy to achieve maximum performance. When editing 4K video, you will need something more powerful than a regular assembled PC or workstation laptop.
![mac mini for music production and video editing mac mini for music production and video editing](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sNOFuh8cBxI/hqdefault.jpg)
Still id wait to does a shootout between the old and new.How to Choose a Computer for Video Editing?įast and high-quality work with large projects requires high-performance equipment. anyway you stack it i can't see one of these new ones beating out the old one on apps that actually use CPU's a lot.
![mac mini for music production and video editing mac mini for music production and video editing](http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Mac-03.jpg)
if thats the case then the higher clock speed and turbo boost will add to a bit more performance with these lame dual core mac minis. someone correct me if I'm wrong but i think the prior mac minis do not have turbo boost. I did notice that the new processors have "turbo boost". So upgrading to the i7 is really more about getting the extra virtual cores than it is about getting a measly 2.8ghz - 3.0ghz. if you only get the i5 then you really only have "2 cores" which is pathetic imo and would not be good for video.
Mac mini for music production and video editing upgrade#
So if you do buy a new one you really need to do the upgrade from the i5 to the i7 which has "hyper threading" that will net you 4 cores. if you would get the quad i7 then you get "hyper threading" which nets you 8 cores.even though its not really equal to actual 8 cores but in many apps the extra virtual cores are used nicely to various processes. If you would have only bought the quad i5 on the older ones then you don't get the "hyper threading" that only comes with the i7's. The newer processors and slightly higher clock speed should mildly offset the fact that its not a quad anymore but how much is a question till someone tests them against the old. going to 16 gigs of RAM made a huge difference. my son used to use an 2009 i7 quad iMac and with 8 gigs of RAM he got lots of spinning beach balls with FCPX when using a moderate amount of plugins. 8 gigs is a joke right now even though it will run but its like putting a 4 cylinder in a cadillac.
Mac mini for music production and video editing software#
if you think 8 gigs is enough now i guarantee in a year or two it won't because software is always wanting more power and resources. also taking it up to 16 gb of RAM is a must and really mandatory as it seems that its no longer user upgradable. The downgrade to dual from quad CPU's doesn't look good.